By Kristin Börjesson
At present, there's a nice variety of techniques to the semantics-pragmatics contrast out there. This publication is exclusive in that it bargains a finished review, comparability and significant review of those techniques. Taking as a kick off point the infamous hassle of differentiating so-called literal from non-literal (or figurative) that means, it covers a variety of the main present issues in semantics and pragmatics, e.g., the saying/meaning contrast, minimalism vs. contextualism, unarticulated materials, indexicalism, (generalised) conversational implicatures, speech acts, degrees of that means in interpretation, the position of context in interpretation, the character of lexical that means. particularly, instead of taking a completely theoretical viewpoint, the e-book integrates psycho- and neurolinguistic views, contemplating experimental effects about the (differences in) processing of a number of the sorts of which means lined. when it comes to subject matters coated and views taken, it really is both like minded for undergraduate in addition to postgraduate scholars of linguistics and/or philosophy of language.
Read or Download The Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy PDF
Similar semantics books
This ebook explores the wide range of circumstances within which the plural of nouns is lexical. whilst a plural is lexicalized it turns into a part of what it's to understand a undeniable observe: pence, for instance, is lexical since it skill a plurality of a definite sort - a a number of price, no longer a collection of actual items like pennies - and realizing this analyzing is understanding the observe.
In 1962 a mimeographed sheet of paper fell into my ownership. It were ready by means of Ernest Adams of the Philosophy division at Berkeley as a handout for a colloquim. Headed 'SOME FALLACIES OF FORMAL common sense' it easily indexed 11 little items of reasoning, all in usual English, and all absurd.
This publication provides comparisons of modern debts within the formalization of common language (dynamic logics and formal semantics) with casual conceptions of interplay (dialogue, usual common sense and attribution of rationality) which have been built in either psychology and epistemology. There are 4 elements which discover: ancient and systematic stories; the formalization of context in epistemology; the formalization of reasoning in interactive contexts in psychology; the formalization of pathological conversations.
- Semantics II: Interpretation and Truth
- Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry (Bradford Books)
- Continuations and Natural Language
- Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics
- Discourse Analysis: An Introduction
- Beyond grammar: an experience-based theory of language
Extra resources for The Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy
Non-salient meanings during interpretation, it does show a difference in the brain areas involved in interpretation related to the salience of the interpreted meaning. Thus, Mashal et al. (2008) investigated the interpretation of highly familiar idioms as compared to their possible compositional interpretation and the interpretation of matched literal sentences. Recall that according to the graded salience hypothesis the (idiomatic) meaning of highly familiar idioms is more salient than the (‘literal’) meaning of their compositional counterparts.
Thus, consider the claims Rachel Giora (1997, 1999, 2002, 2012a,b) makes in the context of her graded salience hypothesis. Although she does not question the general importance of contextual information for utterance interpretation, she argues that regardless of the richness of the context, it can be shown that in particular cases both the literal as well as the non-literal meaning of an expression may be initially activated, suggesting that in such cases, the two types of meaning have the same status.
More speciﬁcally, in terms of the operational sequence of the interpretation process, the fact that the non-literal meaning of an expression may be activated in parallel to its literal meaning rather suggests that they are more similar in nature than traditionally assumed. However, the results of experiments such as the above cannot be used as evidence for one view or the other of literal meaning and non-literal meaning without caution, as there are a number of issues that need careful consideration.
The Semantics-Pragmatics Controversy by Kristin Börjesson