By Francois Recanati
Francois Recanati argues opposed to the conventional knowing of the semantics/pragmatics divide and places ahead a thorough replacement. via part a dozen case reports, he indicates that what an utterance says can't be smartly separated from what the speaker potential. specifically, the speaker's that means endows phrases with senses which are adapted to the placement of utterance and go away from the normal meanings carried through the phrases in isolation. This phenomenon of 'pragmatic modulation' has to be taken into consideration in theorizing approximately semantic content material, for it interacts with the grammar-driven strategy of semantic composition. as a result of that interplay, Recanati argues, the content material of a sentence consistently will depend on the context within which it really is used. This declare defines Contextualism, a view which has attracted huge consciousness in recent times, and of which Recanati is without doubt one of the major proponents.
Read or Download Truth-Conditional Pragmatics PDF
Best semantics books
This booklet explores the big variety of circumstances within which the plural of nouns is lexical. whilst a plural is lexicalized it turns into a part of what it's to understand a definite note: pence, for instance, is lexical since it capacity a plurality of a definite sort - a a number of price, now not a suite of actual items like pennies - and understanding this analyzing is understanding the note.
In 1962 a mimeographed sheet of paper fell into my ownership. It have been ready via Ernest Adams of the Philosophy division at Berkeley as a handout for a colloquim. Headed 'SOME FALLACIES OF FORMAL good judgment' it easily indexed 11 little items of reasoning, all in usual English, and all absurd.
This ebook provides comparisons of modern bills within the formalization of typical language (dynamic logics and formal semantics) with casual conceptions of interplay (dialogue, typical common sense and attribution of rationality) which were constructed in either psychology and epistemology. There are 4 components which discover: ancient and systematic reports; the formalization of context in epistemology; the formalization of reasoning in interactive contexts in psychology; the formalization of pathological conversations.
- Exemplarist moral theory
- Poetry: The Basics
- The Semantics of Word Formation and Lexicalization
- Adverbial Modification: Interval Semantics and Its Rivals
- The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics
- Neuromimetic Semantics: Coordination, Quantification, and Collective Predicates
Extra resources for Truth-Conditional Pragmatics
B I ~ ,I O R A Morrir: ~ r %btg t morise'. trJ aspect of the (stardmg) nmeaung of the comnplcx n a ~ u ~ - p l j 'big r a ~ ilio~tsc'or 'big rlepli~t~~t': That exphins why, llhe the stnrlcl~ngnieanmg ofthe conrplck r~oun-phrci\c, , rhe ~ilein~rrg tlie c>ccasronalmeanlng ot the adjtctlve tlzper~dc,III p ~ r tupon of tlle rlorlil it modifies. As usuAtl,time devxl a ~n the de~rlc,'~rlda lot of detark wotlld 1 i . i the lmguntlc envuourrt~ent(I e. erm and Krat~erglve the foUowing exarnplc to dlow that a sniall elephant 1s not necessarily an e l e ~ l l ~ ~tirat i i t is srrzall fix an elephdnt Irrlag~~ie we had iint ~ntroduceda ,ien,mo poprdated w ~ t t l army ot rtkonsten lrjse K~ngKong We in~ghtthen have s,nd sorni~h~t~g ithe 'j~riribodoc-sn't ha-ve ,I t lr'i~ice, C I ~ I i.
I qfthc rneurziq of tdzo contplcx verb-pizrnse "cut tlzc Rruss'. l~iiiity the cttrttplcvrrrizt 'thegras'. , ,just as it ikpends upon the (staiillingj t~rcanirxgof tllc itcrh i~seli;since Itotl~the verb : i r d its conrplernent are ~:unstiruerrrsof ~ l r ewrh-plirase. ) LO specific eutti~qjoperatioi~s relevant to those ot3ject-s: nlowirrg, slicing, etc. tl>:rt the argument ~7fthe fuirction is deternli~ledby the granl~~~atic;ri object of 'cut', and tlrat the value of' rlie i~~~ictiorz (thc specific ctitting ol3cratiuri at stake) is the occasion menrlinl; of' the verb in thc verk--phrase.
Milt11g)I I I C ' L ~ I I I ~ S ot I & part? ir gunlcrlt of tlte funcnon . u ~ dthe object the rnowxxig process operates rnednlng clf'c u t q r\ not ntliEy tile rnearllng ox1 Clo wll,rr I c ailed rllc occLt\~on of rl-rc word 'cut', or1 anrlly\a. d ~ t cornplernent. isslgn the 1bIIowillg \i,i~iil;lr~p, nwdning to ' ~ c i i t ' - The occ;asiorl rrre:iiling is what wc. get \vl~ei*the garnrnaticd object of 'cut" p~wV"d11:s ;1 V:LJUC fiir the 11igfier ortier varix1)ie "S'. If the object of cuttir~gis $:lidto be grass, we gct: PIIIIS' c ~ i t 'me;lals c:ira.
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics by Francois Recanati